In a previous election, an aspirant appointed me to campaign for him within the state community. My friends from school and the neighbourhood had a different colleague campaigning for the same position as my employer. My friends’ primary aim was to have him elected for them to get certain privileges without considering his qualifications and abilities to deliver. My friends approached me to switch sides and campaign for their aspirant, which I refused by stating clearly the shortcomings of their choice of the aspirant. Later during the elections, my aspirant won the position and then appointed me to a job that has seen me do a lot more good for the people as he continued to serve the state with dignity.
This incidence gave me an insight into the importance of being honest with everything you say or do. It also taught me the privileges that come with observing loyalty to that which you believe serves you right. Since then, I have grown with a great desire to consider my character in any controversial situations that I face. It is crucial for charity to begin at home, that is, people should utilize what is at their disposal to ensure they change their environment and experience, as well as that of others within that community. Regardless of the controversy presented, I believe character comes first, and I should utilize my character aspects such as honesty and loyalty to make ethical decisions that promote the greater good for all.
Ethical Issue Recognition:
The given early voting scenario is debatable, given the prevailing situations that lead to the development of the ethical issue in question. The controversy arises because Holy Martin has the liberty to do as she pleases, like voting via absentee ballot. Her vote is critical because it could lead to the election of a good government focused on societal development and justice. However, Holy doesn’t qualify for this technique because she is present within the state and should vote on election day. I have a responsibility to point out her case, but she has a freedom of confidentiality that I should respect. Additionally, giving her up might lose us a vote because she is loyal to our party, and the authority could lock her up, which seems unfair given she is a widow in her seventies.
Some decisions are likely to arise from this ethical issue. First, I can choose to point out Holy’s case and have her vote cancelled, which could lead to losing the election and appointment of a weak government that does not focus on societal growth and development. Secondly, I can ignore the case to guarantee our party the win which assures us of good governance. However, this decision is at the expense of my responsibilities, character, and authority expectations.
Making the above decisions has several implications, both other involved parties and me. The impact from my first decision is that it will uphold my honesty character, it will be a way of serving my state appropriately, but our party may lose the elections raising a poor administration to governance. Additionally, the decision will ruin my relationship with Holy Martin as she may get an authoritative punishment for her crime. The implication from my second decision is that we may secure victory in the elections, raising an excellent administration to governance and Holy Martin will go free and at peace.
Applications of Ethical Concepts:
In making an ethical decision concerning this scenario, all eight key questions are applicable. Fairness is a consideration because it is unfair sentencing a seventy-year-old widow. The choices I make also have several outcomes to the state, and I have responsibilities to pursue in my position. Additionally, Holy deserves empathy because o her situation, she has the liberty to do what she pleases with her life, and I have a character to uphold when making choices. All parties in the scenario have exclusive rights for consideration, and the relevant authorities have different expectations regarding the situation.
The most critical questions for this scenario are fairness, character, and liberty. Fairness reminds me that Holy is 70 years and could be unable to attend elections and she is a responsible citizen who exercised her voting rights. Also, the opposing party deserves fair treatment by knowing the situation, but that may lead to cancellation of the vote, loss of the election, and unfair imprisonment of the widow. By considering fairness only, I would ignore her case and count her vote as valid because she is loyal to the party, and it would be unfair to sentencing her because she exercised her right. Holy did not hurt anyone and imprisoning a 70-year-old widow is harming an already hurting person.
In this scenario, character insights that I need to uphold honesty, I need to be loyal to my party if Holy voted for it, and that she could be expressing unlikable characters by practising absentee voting when she doesn’t qualify. By considering the character question only, I would point out her case and cancel her vote because otherwise is being dishonest and disloyal to my employer.
The third most critical key question in this scenario is liberty, which dictates that Holy has the freedom to vote as she pleases, she has confidentiality entitlement, and I have the freedom to decide on the case as I wish. By considering liberty alone, I would still count her vote because her freedom to vote via absentee ballot does not hurt anyone and I have right to decide on her case with her absentee vote being critical to our race.
Evaluation of Different Perspectives:
Character leads me to believe that I should be loyal and honest in my position and that I should point out Holy’s case and have her vote cancelled. However, fairness tells me to consider the fact that holy has been loyal to our party all through; she is a responsible citizen who has the liberty to vote in the manner she pleases. It also leads me to consider the fact that Holy is a 70-year-old widow whose situations may have to dictate her choice of voting style. Therefore, fairness and liberty take the win because, in this scenario, they promote the development of the greater good. I will count in her absentee ballot.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ESSAY OVEN TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT